「抄襲」不是用「兩個文本擁有相同的一句話」就可以定義的。475Please respect copyright.PENANAHmgJf5SQOw
475Please respect copyright.PENANAo1jKzUIIYp
書名和標題也是,撞句、撞名不能算抄襲,「抄襲」是很嚴重的指控,在指控他人抄襲時,要先把證據擺出來。475Please respect copyright.PENANAM2iVRx3TG9
475Please respect copyright.PENANAflZogMDQwN
這就是「舉證之所在,敗訴之所在」。475Please respect copyright.PENANAtenI4k84l5
475Please respect copyright.PENANAQgMf9ze8O8
翻成白話文就是:提告者要負舉證之責任,如果證據不足或不被採用,則可能導致敗訴。475Please respect copyright.PENANAWyiA0gKVsU
475Please respect copyright.PENANAe458sXWK9I
【全國法規資料庫:著作權法】475Please respect copyright.PENANA62Z3GUluJi
475Please respect copyright.PENANAdWcgUGIhkG
reurl.cc/OvGelX475Please respect copyright.PENANAbpSrDf6hTw
475Please respect copyright.PENANAUmdmo5Z3PS
【著作權筆記:「抄襲」有無明確的定義】475Please respect copyright.PENANAEWlOyHH2yC
475Please respect copyright.PENANAFEwfOAymLH
reurl.cc/RzWQx9475Please respect copyright.PENANA2Lvrrii6AJ
475Please respect copyright.PENANAHVyRCWKS3c
【音樂侵權的認定,更複雜】475Please respect copyright.PENANAwTOpsu9dkR
475Please respect copyright.PENANADiNhBMlust
crossing.cw.com.tw/article/16062475Please respect copyright.PENANAKC7XsEeHjO
475Please respect copyright.PENANAuC4GZ24yuz
這裡說明一下:法律並沒有「抄襲」字樣,著作權法和「抄襲」有關的是「重製」、「改作」。475Please respect copyright.PENANAz10RV0sUze
475Please respect copyright.PENANAMlaxfms0Oa
然後,學術上的認定比法律嚴格,因為法律是社會的安全網,算是底線,如果太過嚴格,會導致民眾動不動就觸法,也會讓有心人士拿著法條當攻擊武器 (我一直認為法條是防禦/護身武器,而非攻擊武器),這也是為何法律非常重視程序和證據的主因。
arrow_back
寫詩這件事及其他
more_vert
-
info_outline Info
-
toc Table of Contents
-
share Share
-
format_color_text Display Settings
-
exposure_plus_1 Recommend
-
report_problem Report
-
account_circle Login
Search stories, writers or societies
Continue ReadingClear All
What Others Are ReadingRefresh
X
Never miss what's happening on Penana!
寫詩這件事及其他
Author:
W.H.

ISSUE #22
舉證之所在,敗訴之所在
LIKES 8
READS 471
BOOKMARKS 10

Click to load the next chapter
×
Write down what you like about the story
×
Reading Theme:
Font Size:
Line Spacing:
Paragraph Spacing:
Load the next issue automatically
Reset to default
×
People Who Like This