多謝巴絲們的指正,以下為此Post的更正:577Please respect copyright.PENANAn47OsWGUgV
577Please respect copyright.PENANAK5U7iGjy12
三十秒科學–種樹是否一定能夠減低大氣二氧化碳含量?577Please respect copyright.PENANA13JESjDrEI
- 分享自 LIHKG 討論區577Please respect copyright.PENANA7kRZBD1GkQ
https://lih.kg/2544217577Please respect copyright.PENANAY3pG51dbZ9
577Please respect copyright.PENANA7EIgdQGjJC
577Please respect copyright.PENANAxWHQF3Z0me
圖片摘取自Ref1及2577Please respect copyright.PENANAls8H8m7Kzp577Please respect copyright.PENANA82NhQzmJsb
577Please respect copyright.PENANA4pWYfVJgRH
577Please respect copyright.PENANA4aEgPrYGxW
研究中指出草叢/部份樹木因配合泥土菌類獲取營養方式的不同,雖長得比較矮小,但能夠在泥土儲存較多的碳原子。577Please respect copyright.PENANA6fbnv0l0sS
577Please respect copyright.PENANAQz06ofsgGJ
而部分樹木因依靠泥土中的菌類幫忙,得以長得更高,而與此同時泥土相關的菌類則會釋放出更多的二氧化碳。577Please respect copyright.PENANAiAQJd9I9sw
577Please respect copyright.PENANAhi5GpIr4sB
雖然長大較高的樹木比較低的草叢有更強的能力透過光合作用儲存碳原子,但相應地,助長樹木生長的菌類亦會從泥土中釋發出比助長草叢生長的菌類更多的二氧化碳。577Please respect copyright.PENANAxejv6asaZY
577Please respect copyright.PENANATqwTcSIYtR
研究中並無證據直接顯示草叢吸取大氣二氧化碳的能力比樹木更高,上一篇我引述錯誤,若然引起任何誤會,希望可以見諒。577Please respect copyright.PENANAHCYdkZATFc
577Please respect copyright.PENANApTuHWCnMef
Ref1:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01117-5577Please respect copyright.PENANAC44BOvfcD6
Ref2:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00737-1
577Please respect copyright.PENANA4CMyredfyF