多謝巴絲們的指正,以下為此Post的更正:586Please respect copyright.PENANAIygi7LlKFf
586Please respect copyright.PENANAPPScXOL4vj
三十秒科學–種樹是否一定能夠減低大氣二氧化碳含量?586Please respect copyright.PENANAjPxUasum5c
- 分享自 LIHKG 討論區586Please respect copyright.PENANAw00qjqtDzv
https://lih.kg/2544217586Please respect copyright.PENANAHx7gRe2jcK
586Please respect copyright.PENANA2oT8gifI9K
586Please respect copyright.PENANAdDJnr3T7Rl
圖片摘取自Ref1及2586Please respect copyright.PENANACijPq8DZjG586Please respect copyright.PENANAQMwS5iyUVj
586Please respect copyright.PENANAAfVpiKtIF9
586Please respect copyright.PENANAFAjMmszCWK
研究中指出草叢/部份樹木因配合泥土菌類獲取營養方式的不同,雖長得比較矮小,但能夠在泥土儲存較多的碳原子。586Please respect copyright.PENANAkLZEw5ijqE
586Please respect copyright.PENANA9dSCiX55j1
而部分樹木因依靠泥土中的菌類幫忙,得以長得更高,而與此同時泥土相關的菌類則會釋放出更多的二氧化碳。586Please respect copyright.PENANA3mqbGFx7Yk
586Please respect copyright.PENANAjv6fpg1HCH
雖然長大較高的樹木比較低的草叢有更強的能力透過光合作用儲存碳原子,但相應地,助長樹木生長的菌類亦會從泥土中釋發出比助長草叢生長的菌類更多的二氧化碳。586Please respect copyright.PENANAZH5TIinb6B
586Please respect copyright.PENANAnKZkjzzPG0
研究中並無證據直接顯示草叢吸取大氣二氧化碳的能力比樹木更高,上一篇我引述錯誤,若然引起任何誤會,希望可以見諒。586Please respect copyright.PENANAOfOMAnY4wx
586Please respect copyright.PENANApm2SdzAxDL
Ref1:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01117-5586Please respect copyright.PENANA2cDvfn66t7
Ref2:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00737-1
586Please respect copyright.PENANAEtCBMEjsOp