科普專欄–薯不揀單 - (更正)三十秒科學–種樹是否一定能夠減低大氣二氧化碳含量？

多謝巴絲們的指正，以下為此Post的更正：587Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡo8x7v4NfAw
587Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡ8A33ftucMz
三十秒科學–種樹是否一定能夠減低大氣二氧化碳含量？587Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡjdcQQh8cER
- 分享自 LIHKG 討論區587Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡhZqJjl0HhQ
https://lih.kg/2544217587Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡwjQBfrpW7O
587Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡwGa9HeaVTM
587Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡ5UBL6KFQYt
圖片摘取自Ref1及2587Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡro2jqM4Spy
587Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡvqkZIfOZwh
587Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡyNL88UDyqM
587Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡZ52rhQmPw3
研究中指出草叢/部份樹木因配合泥土菌類獲取營養方式的不同，雖長得比較矮小，但能夠在泥土儲存較多的碳原子。587Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡV1euBfsqcI
587Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡtOzPUBM39E
而部分樹木因依靠泥土中的菌類幫忙，得以長得更高，而與此同時泥土相關的菌類則會釋放出更多的二氧化碳。587Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡFpKv9ujPtQ
587Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡKYRREbG3tj
雖然長大較高的樹木比較低的草叢有更強的能力透過光合作用儲存碳原子，但相應地，助長樹木生長的菌類亦會從泥土中釋發出比助長草叢生長的菌類更多的二氧化碳。587Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡRRM3264sws
587Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡR16Bb6EcMg
研究中並無證據直接顯示草叢吸取大氣二氧化碳的能力比樹木更高，上一篇我引述錯誤，若然引起任何誤會，希望可以見諒。587Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡzK9m68lfPO
587Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡLkmruTUjZw
Ref1:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01117-5587Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡ6OEj2Cqufn
Ref2:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00737-1

587Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡ29Mxq8udh0

ns216.73.216.206da2

介面主題:

字體大小:

行距:

段距:

自動加載下一章