多謝巴絲們的指正，以下為此Post的更正：487Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡX8qw3Sg9vg
487Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡhdzPxqepVn
三十秒科學–種樹是否一定能夠減低大氣二氧化碳含量？487Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡmvgWuNFikp
- 分享自 LIHKG 討論區487Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡKahYm6Wxjc
https://lih.kg/2544217487Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡP6R0B6RPXa
487Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡyXFxnkpvGD
487Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡqT8uqKdoyz
圖片摘取自Ref1及2487Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡd0oQ1cmLuc
487Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡkhxKi9C5QV
487Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡeKo8DF4mcS
487Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡIHJo24D4Gs
研究中指出草叢/部份樹木因配合泥土菌類獲取營養方式的不同，雖長得比較矮小，但能夠在泥土儲存較多的碳原子。487Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡx7Y0fxj2KL
487Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡ53GEUrjaSV
而部分樹木因依靠泥土中的菌類幫忙，得以長得更高，而與此同時泥土相關的菌類則會釋放出更多的二氧化碳。487Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡjTgpjWRErN
487Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡGxrT1Fqqiv
雖然長大較高的樹木比較低的草叢有更強的能力透過光合作用儲存碳原子，但相應地，助長樹木生長的菌類亦會從泥土中釋發出比助長草叢生長的菌類更多的二氧化碳。487Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡjKg0reubn4
487Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡpj4LO72OfT
研究中並無證據直接顯示草叢吸取大氣二氧化碳的能力比樹木更高，上一篇我引述錯誤，若然引起任何誤會，希望可以見諒。487Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡTbsiWMHJXW
487Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡsiCVbzKPcR
Ref1:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01117-5487Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡJ8VsiHugNQ
Ref2:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00737-1
487Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡHjtxhrsH1s
然後按「加至主畫面」