在應對武肺的方針上,中國現時共有兩款滅活疫苗處於臨床研究Phase3的過程。887Please respect copyright.PENANATO0gc5PudB887Please respect copyright.PENANAEMS8wKxPnJ
887Please respect copyright.PENANA0awtpolVr6
兩款設計理念相同的疫苗分別為香港人相對較為認識的科興(Sinovac),以及國營機構(Sinopharm/CNBG)。887Please respect copyright.PENANAvyllnv0uJV
887Please respect copyright.PENANAw23Fc7jQT6
只不過,既然設計理念相同,那麼兩者的分別究竟何在呢?887Please respect copyright.PENANAs3CD9ONi7E
887Please respect copyright.PENANAh5XGGh61on
887Please respect copyright.PENANADxYTNDgGRD
(圖2)在深入兩者分別前,我們需要理解一下滅活疫苗的製造方式。887Please respect copyright.PENANAOzsRxcY4Su887Please respect copyright.PENANAlf4XvYL4nw
887Please respect copyright.PENANANTnLes8BDf
首先,醫生或科學家會從一名進入深切治療部的中國病患肺部體液中抽取病毒,經過數輪實驗室細胞的培植,最後加入化學物消減病毒的感染力以及多重過濾,最終取得弱化的武肺病毒作疫苗的原材料。887Please respect copyright.PENANA9wVvCP4jm8
887Please respect copyright.PENANAhydtVSDC5l
從病人體液中抽取病毒後,病毒便可經由實驗室細胞無限量地培植,不需再向病人作任何的抽取動作。887Please respect copyright.PENANA4UcOTUWclX
887Please respect copyright.PENANA2koru2Nz3y
(圖3)根據現有文獻(Ref1及Ref2),科興疫苗的病毒原材料為CN2 strain,而國營疫苗的病毒原材料為WIV04 strain;887Please respect copyright.PENANA2fik9gKw2S
為方便有興趣的讀者,兩者排組的超連結已列在文末。887Please respect copyright.PENANANKZg0i5900887Please respect copyright.PENANAnBUfVJIg9a
887Please respect copyright.PENANAeGAroHtAkd
比較兩款疫苗的病毒原材料的氨基酸排組,兩者在學界所認定的區域中接近是一模一樣,唯一的方別就處於Orf8區域上,箇中有著一顆氨基酸的差別不同。887Please respect copyright.PENANAwzoEF7dCU9
887Please respect copyright.PENANApMx23dKvcT
(圖4)Orf8的84號位置氨基酸經常被錄得變異,而科興及國營所用的病毒原材料,在該位置的氨基酸並不相同。887Please respect copyright.PENANA9BxgW74bbb887Please respect copyright.PENANAUGbxvucsei
887Please respect copyright.PENANAnAkSZLVl3z
887Please respect copyright.PENANAr2DlL8kQjK
(圖5)另外,兩款疫苗均用上化學物beta-propiolactone(BPL)消減病毒感染力。籠統來說,BPL能夠與蛋白質產生化學作用,因而能夠對病毒的各種結構作出一定程度的「破壞」。887Please respect copyright.PENANAuHTCMRgqed887Please respect copyright.PENANA6pLm1pRMu8
887Please respect copyright.PENANAICMpCWdgNq
這化學物較常用在消毒手術工具等方面,基於這物質揮發性較高,消毒完成後可透過加熱或真空的方式移除化學物。887Please respect copyright.PENANAJmfYu1Su5b
但基於其致癌的性質,這化學物並不適宜動用在沒有專業工具或設施的日常方面。887Please respect copyright.PENANA3v3yoTxIQF
887Please respect copyright.PENANArGTmUtUuZL
有趣的是,根據文獻記載,科興疫苗所用的BPL消毒時間為24小時,而國營疫苗所用的BPL消毒時間為48小時。887Please respect copyright.PENANABYCPRVDpup
兩者有所差別的原因暫時不詳,有可能是兩者所用的BPL濃度有所不同,因此所需的消毒時間亦有分別。887Please respect copyright.PENANAK1m8ssob7I
887Please respect copyright.PENANATa0Fjvk45u
有心的讀者可以比對一下兩款疫苗所用的BPL濃度,本人暫時找不到相關資料作出比對。887Please respect copyright.PENANA71tdQKSFxB
887Please respect copyright.PENANABsFshFz9gL
除病毒原料排組、BPL消毒時間外,兩款疫苗在製作上可能亦有著截然不同的分別,但本人閱覽現知已公開的文獻資料後並找不出適當的資料作對比,非常歡迎有心人提供可作引用的公開資料作補充。887Please respect copyright.PENANAwHqCyIbDvx
887Please respect copyright.PENANA8fyuipCvNx
而在物流的處理上,根據新華社報導(Ref5),中國已在公開第三期臨床報告前為四百五十萬人注射國產疫苗,而國營疫苗手頭上暫時共有一千萬枝疫苗,2021年預計能生產一億枝疫苗(Ref6)。887Please respect copyright.PENANAK7prZ9Tenx
887Please respect copyright.PENANAtWy70bDhEK
而讓人振奮的是,中國在12月31日的公開記者會上表示(Ref5),將會免費為所有中國人注射國產疫苗。887Please respect copyright.PENANAg6r5bn7mmq
887Please respect copyright.PENANAOO6HDJhwpq
然而,繼新年賀辭及淘寶上均被遺忘的香港,在法庭上雖已遵照人民日報的領導下將肥佬黎再度囚禁,但亦未能獲得中國的垂青,只能跟巴西及土耳其等國家一樣,獲取購買科興疫苗的權利,而不能得到中國人免費注射國產疫苗的恩賜。887Please respect copyright.PENANAnerFpMfev3
887Please respect copyright.PENANAeG3OfVhePf
887Please respect copyright.PENANANm4Po6Zzdp
CN2 strain排組: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MT407650.1/ (Sinovac)887Please respect copyright.PENANAF5fSWJw4OT
WIV04 strain排組:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN996528.1/ (Sinopharm)887Please respect copyright.PENANAWIOHC2Ns5H
Ref1:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7202686/887Please respect copyright.PENANA3wC66Si7JK
Ref2:https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2769612887Please respect copyright.PENANAhnan0HyMS9
Ref3:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7577707/887Please respect copyright.PENANAe2dH0XRqEp
Ref4:https://science.sciencemag.org/content/370/6522/1263887Please respect copyright.PENANAtrjvnSJfcI
Ref5:http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2020-12/31/c_139632627.htm887Please respect copyright.PENANAlk2vGKZSM5
Ref6:https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/12/it-s-crazy-upbeat-covid-19-vaccine-news-china-and-uk-leave-scientists-wanting-more887Please respect copyright.PENANAOL9i4sLW7M
887Please respect copyright.PENANAyfLutYLCgI
887Please respect copyright.PENANAPvxAjZUUAt
有興趣接收科學資訊的話,歡迎follow IG: potatopigtongue。887Please respect copyright.PENANA1dFZ3FZn8X
887Please respect copyright.PENANAPM7QAenz6q
https://www.instagram.com/potatopigtongue/887Please respect copyright.PENANAIO7i3jh30a
arrow_back
科普專欄–薯不揀單
more_vert
-
info_outline 資料
-
toc 目錄
-
share 分享
-
format_color_text 介面設置
-
exposure_plus_1 推薦
-
打賞
-
report_problem 檢舉
-
account_circle 登入
X
科普專欄–薯不揀單
作者:
薯仔聞茱莉
![薯仔聞茱莉](https://static2.penana.com/fit-in/24x24/images/users/large/10/56/10560680635a34d605a71d62.38826921-27349.jpeg)
篇 #128
深入淺出–兩款國產滅活疫苗的分別及其反思
喜歡 1
閱讀 883
書籤 148
campaign
催更 0
打賞
![](https://static2.penana.com/img/social/facebook.png)
按此加載下一章
X
每次催更後,作者都會收到通知!
smartphone100 → 催更
×
寫下你喜歡這個故事的地方
×
對此喜歡的人