科普專欄–薯不揀單 - (更正)三十秒科學–種樹是否一定能夠減低大氣二氧化碳含量？

多謝巴絲們的指正，以下為此Post的更正：527Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡWPzKSCvkDg
527Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡ1yN4mTrti9
三十秒科學–種樹是否一定能夠減低大氣二氧化碳含量？527Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡbodh7RWpiw
- 分享自 LIHKG 討論區527Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡW232Z6QlAS
https://lih.kg/2544217527Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡ4TVT6ut8Be
527Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡXJIf789b81
527Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡGaPwxivJjp
圖片摘取自Ref1及2527Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡa8tqKEMhAG
527Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡQ44p6K0Yyb
527Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡqEkLBmc6hd
527Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡV6eh7eqKn9
研究中指出草叢/部份樹木因配合泥土菌類獲取營養方式的不同，雖長得比較矮小，但能夠在泥土儲存較多的碳原子。527Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡIIerRCZq7i
527Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡ7FbWbY9swh
而部分樹木因依靠泥土中的菌類幫忙，得以長得更高，而與此同時泥土相關的菌類則會釋放出更多的二氧化碳。527Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡRQC668G5YO
527Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡybHJAQQszt
雖然長大較高的樹木比較低的草叢有更強的能力透過光合作用儲存碳原子，但相應地，助長樹木生長的菌類亦會從泥土中釋發出比助長草叢生長的菌類更多的二氧化碳。527Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡ4odpEZd4ri
527Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡ4MkLGB5sVU
研究中並無證據直接顯示草叢吸取大氣二氧化碳的能力比樹木更高，上一篇我引述錯誤，若然引起任何誤會，希望可以見諒。527Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡTov8bi9qqc
527Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡiudGUWS10F
Ref1:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01117-5527Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡfKIwPT14hq
Ref2:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00737-1

527Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡBXYP0MJOHy

ns216.73.216.224da2

介面主題:

字體大小:

行距:

段距:

自動加載下一章