科普專欄–薯不揀單 - (更正)三十秒科學–種樹是否一定能夠減低大氣二氧化碳含量？

多謝巴絲們的指正，以下為此Post的更正：785Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡtyeBe2HhKV
785Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡ8wT6IUxYhV
三十秒科學–種樹是否一定能夠減低大氣二氧化碳含量？785Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡDyUx1pLYIN
- 分享自 LIHKG 討論區785Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡvSxm3yAZBY
https://lih.kg/2544217785Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡG5LCYax6Dd
785Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡ93tgvMI5Va
785Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡhnou37X6tY
圖片摘取自Ref1及2785Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡ8yuf2drSgF
785Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡTO4nHM7pG7
785Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡdldZZ18Zin
785Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡJgyih25jQS
研究中指出草叢/部份樹木因配合泥土菌類獲取營養方式的不同，雖長得比較矮小，但能夠在泥土儲存較多的碳原子。785Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡxVwEWpByOm
785Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡUSHi772GWp
而部分樹木因依靠泥土中的菌類幫忙，得以長得更高，而與此同時泥土相關的菌類則會釋放出更多的二氧化碳。785Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡNjMAKCGhdM
785Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡLlSDnGpA7E
雖然長大較高的樹木比較低的草叢有更強的能力透過光合作用儲存碳原子，但相應地，助長樹木生長的菌類亦會從泥土中釋發出比助長草叢生長的菌類更多的二氧化碳。785Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡIiDKuTn7KQ
785Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡxyojbnPJet
研究中並無證據直接顯示草叢吸取大氣二氧化碳的能力比樹木更高，上一篇我引述錯誤，若然引起任何誤會，希望可以見諒。785Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡTzffXVkXjV
785Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡtHaRUHEJ3e
Ref1:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01117-5785Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡnjiCDGy3kk
Ref2:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00737-1

785Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡtuVOgefozl

ns216.73.216.217da2

Reading Theme:

Font Size:

Line Spacing:

Paragraph Spacing:

Load the next issue automatically