根據一篇尚未接受同行審查的文章(Ref1),Moderna及輝端疫苗兩者在人體所產生的抗體數量並無大分別,而且抗體所針對病毒的位置,亦跟自然感染武肺人士所產生的抗體相同。757Please respect copyright.PENANAO4XSjEDzfp
757Please respect copyright.PENANA7pfcwb0usq
注射兩者第二劑疫苗的3-14星期後,其抗體數量約與自然感染人士1.3個月後的數量接近。757Please respect copyright.PENANAoOmTlnQLmS
757Please respect copyright.PENANAFbjam8j66g
奈何的是,疫苗所產生的抗體,其應對英國/南非變種的能力明顯有所銳弱。根據抗體種類的不同,有一些抗體應對變種病毒的能力至少被銳弱了十倍以上有多。757Please respect copyright.PENANAdF9W06BxVf
757Please respect copyright.PENANAS6hy5I4M1e
同時間,把武肺病毒與疫苗抗體共同培植的話,能生存下來的武肺病毒亦出現與英國及南非變種一樣的排序,變相逆向證明疫苗或自然感染未變種病毒人士的抗體沒能有效應對最新的南非/英國或旗下牽伸的各種變種。757Please respect copyright.PENANAdwxLb1pyLK
757Please respect copyright.PENANAkji23jpaN1
若然屬實,Moderna/輝端疫苗很有可能要更新第二代作出應對。757Please respect copyright.PENANAi59roCZJsS
757Please respect copyright.PENANAALI57cH8NK
至於科興及國藥疫苗會否同屬一命運,則尚未清楚,但在理論層面上,滅活疫苗應對變種的可能性會較mRNA疫苗更高。757Please respect copyright.PENANA6Wl6jGP8z9
757Please respect copyright.PENANASYRcdCfkEf
不過理論歸理論,一切尚需實驗證據確實。757Please respect copyright.PENANAAp92utaNZh
757Please respect copyright.PENANACJfyR6anPt
757Please respect copyright.PENANATn7PbG8PHn
757Please respect copyright.PENANARbjMf7xxWX
Ref1:https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.01.15.426911v1.full.pdf757Please respect copyright.PENANA6r1uJ2oxPQ
arrow_back
科普專欄–薯不揀單
more_vert
-
info_outline 資料
-
toc 目錄
-
share 分享
-
format_color_text 介面設置
-
exposure_plus_1 推薦
-
打賞
-
report_problem 檢舉
-
account_circle 登入
X
科普專欄–薯不揀單
作者:
薯仔聞茱莉
篇 #141
Moderna及輝瑞疫苗對抗英國及南非的武肺變種能力
喜歡 1
閱讀 753
書籤 151
campaign
催更 0
打賞
以 Facebook 帳號登入
或 註册/登入 以留言或加上書籤 按此加載下一章
X
每次催更後,作者都會收到通知!
smartphone100
→ 催更
×
寫下你喜歡這個故事的地方
×
對此喜歡的人
x
Before You Publish
Please ensure your story does not contain illegal, hateful, inciting, or violence-promoting content, or any infringing, plagiarized, or spam material, and that it complies with Penana’s Terms of Use.
Penana reserves the right to remove any content that violates these rules or causes legal or community risk, and to suspend or terminate related accounts.

