I like to play a game whenever I read. I try to dissect the story in order to figure out the ending before I reach it. Maybe it's a product of my only ever reading scifi/fantasy, but it's gotten to a point where I cant shut off that analytical voice in my head and simply enjoy the story. I have to understand.337Please respect copyright.PENANA6fG2CZD0kd
337Please respect copyright.PENANAbOmQOq3XfF
Recently I finished the last book in the Ancestor Trilogy by Mark Lawrence who, in my opinion, is one of the best fantasy authors of recent years. He is a very intelligent man with a degree in math, a PhD in physics, and has even worked on something called the "Star Wars" missile defense program (seriously, read about him.)337Please respect copyright.PENANAmgL06iYuM2
337Please respect copyright.PENANAkklOEmYM3Q
He also has Aphantasia (categorized as the inability to fully visualize something in your mind) which he refuses to categorize as a 'condition,' but rather an alternate way of thinking. I would agree with that opinion. I tend to over-imagine whenever I write, seeing the full picture and then slowly going from the top-down, picking out words, phrases, feelings, and metaphors that I wish to convey to the viewer. He goes from the ground-up and does the same thing, starting from a foundation and simply building upon it. 337Please respect copyright.PENANAVMkAa8L10b
337Please respect copyright.PENANAigcpvLZmmZ
His process arguably leads to a more stable story. It creates intricate, well-thought-out narration with an overarching plot that has less plot holes. But here's the thing... is there such a thing as being too well thought out? It sounds silly, but let me follow up with this: have you ever read a story and thought to yourself, "wow, everything is working out a little too cleanly?"337Please respect copyright.PENANAWkOupfi1nq
337Please respect copyright.PENANAAOqbpfoIxQ
Its not a crime to have a too-clean story; far from it. Most stories are. The reason why Game of Thrones was such a massive hit was because the whole point of it was that it wasn't clean, and aimed to demonstrate how un-clean real life really is—how prone to happenstance and variables each of our lives are. Its pretty scary when you think about it, which is why we take solace in stories that wrap up neatly where the protagonist always wins.337Please respect copyright.PENANABQJWuQUl0U
337Please respect copyright.PENANAhmTJxBmiBY
But when things work out a little too well, when the protagonist gets a little too ahead too quickly, then we think to ourselves, "like that would ever happen. Scoff."337Please respect copyright.PENANAkqPfNFVnMZ
337Please respect copyright.PENANAn6mX9igRHw
I would urge you to stop reading this if you would like to avoid spoilers. Go read Red Sister at the very least, then come back to finish later.337Please respect copyright.PENANA6YAkbVCEAx
337Please respect copyright.PENANAW9zBmdxUZr
Mark, being the cleverboots that he is, manages to conceal the cleanliness of his plot in two ways: 1) by very deliberately hiding information from us while the character is actively taking actions, and only ever revealing the motivation behind those actions once they're done. And 2), by having an incredibly intelligent, competent, and borderline prescient character named Abbess Glass. 337Please respect copyright.PENANAi8HbZfSFKF
337Please respect copyright.PENANAcFrGE4ekms
Abbess Glass, savior and mentor to the protagonist Nona Grey, is famed for her foresight, capable of nonmagically 'seeing' how certain events will pan out far before they do. She has a wide information network, a discerning mind capable of penetrating the core personality of every person she meets, and a political touch so subtle that no one ever realizes that they've been playing her game until its too late to make a move.337Please respect copyright.PENANAilXs2kidUN
337Please respect copyright.PENANAYdmznS65X4
She makes a wonderful vehicle for the plot, because in the end the story can say, "all according to Abbess Glass' plan." Which is a reductive statement that unjustly trivializes the work and skill that Mark Lawrence puts into his story, but is ultimately what happens. Even when Abbess Glass loses (which isn't often) she gains something, and when she wins, she wins big.337Please respect copyright.PENANAOzFDksS9uo
337Please respect copyright.PENANAakh2kU0kjw
Which, as a reader, is exactly what I want to see.337Please respect copyright.PENANAdcaT5TbjHO
337Please respect copyright.PENANAfciypZIkP2
And which, as a storyteller, is what I always expect.337Please respect copyright.PENANATXmiUsD2aV
337Please respect copyright.PENANAVjI7NnOOQ7
I make this observation not as a criticism, but just that—an observation. My respect comes from looking for this trick in Lawrence's work and him still managing to delight me. He used facets of the world that he introduced in Book 1 to catch me off guard through the end of Book 3. He arguably hasn't done anything subversive, reinventive, or new, but his pacing, his worldbuilding, and the style in which he hides the cleanliness of the plotline should be something that every prospective storyteller studies.337Please respect copyright.PENANAZo9b1YuiHB
337Please respect copyright.PENANAnC2sbmt8CU
Novelists are magicians on a tightrope. The audience expects us to make it to the other side unharmed, demanding that we astound them with magic tricks and flips on the way. Lean too much to one side and we fall. Perform a trick that they've all seen on YouTube and we bore them. Promise them a show only to walk to the end with no magic or flips and they'll get irritated. But focus hard, keep your balance, choose the right time to work your magic for maximum effect, and not even the Death Star will have a missile defense program good enough to stop your photon torpedoes from penetrating its thermal exhaustion port the size of a womp rat.337Please respect copyright.PENANAsOntNh31QE
337Please respect copyright.PENANAAFVwfcuQ8Z
See what I did there?337Please respect copyright.PENANABrcqqnPZzm
337Please respect copyright.PENANAQ0rqddAiHF
Sincerely,337Please respect copyright.PENANAEv27jamsN7
Chris337Please respect copyright.PENANAxd9laJSfLJ
337Please respect copyright.PENANAchUA2OUIpd
arrow_back
Shower Hour
more_vert
-
info_outline 資料
-
toc 目錄
-
share 分享
-
format_color_text 介面設置
-
exposure_plus_1 推薦
-
打賞
-
report_problem 檢舉
-
account_circle 登入
X
Shower Hour
作者:
ChrisWritesNow

篇 #2
Deus Exposition
喜歡 0
閱讀 333
書籤 1
campaign
催更 0
打賞
提出編輯建議

按此加載下一章
X
每次催更後,作者都會收到通知!
smartphone100 → 催更
×
Shower Hour
文章
最後更新: Feb 26, 2023
總字數: 7,204
總閱讀時間: 33 分鐘
作者:
philosophy
showerthoughts
檢舉這個故事
×
寫下你喜歡這個故事的地方
×
對此喜歡的人