arrow_back
疫苗打不打?
more_vert
-
info_outline Info
-
toc Table of Contents
-
share Share
-
format_color_text Display Settings
-
exposure_plus_1 Recommend
-
Sponsor
-
report_problem Report
-
account_circle Login
Search stories, writers or societies
Continue ReadingClear All
What Others Are ReadingRefresh
X
Never miss what's happening on Penana!
G
✪ Submission Closed
疫苗打不打?
Challengers: 



























Judging: Community Vote
Total Bounty Amount: 10000
(5 contributors)
(5 contributors)
Prompt
Entries
Comments (50)
上班後一團糟了快2個月,甚麼也接不上來。
只粗略地看了點疫苗的比較表和出處。
最特別是輝瑞,
輝瑞近乎 = 拜登 = 奧巴馬 = 希拉尼 = 克林頓
還是說,所有疫苗都原出於一?
希望大家能多些分享你的專業見解
有助大家一起思考
疫苗,打還是不打?
謝謝
Total Reading Time: 19 minutes
toc Entries
10 sponsors' comments

半調 sponsored 100
for Issue 29!
for Issue 29!分析理性沉實
5 years ago ⋅ 1 replyReply

檸檬伯爵
謝謝
5 years ago ⋅ 0 repliesReply

半調 sponsored 100
for Issue 16!
for Issue 16!欲速則不達,對於全球的疫情上,各國還是各自發展,始終沒綜合技術取長補短。這成了一種政治和商業的競賽,有利益在其中時,效用大致成了次要。成了每年必須重新注射,在絕對治療的前提下,退一步來權衡長遠的商務一般。在這觀念下而研發的產品,值得三思而行才作這終生的決定較為合宜
5 years ago ⋅ 1 replyReply

飄流書生
@半調 英雄所見略同!
5 years ago ⋅ 0 repliesReply
Show more...
黑暗
恐怖
末世
陰謀
恐懼
心寒
生
病
狂
疫
陽謀
症
老
藥
戰慄
痴
bookmark_border
Bookmark
Start Reading >
X
After each update request, the author will receive a notification!
smartphone100
→ Request update
X
Sponsor again
Click to login
Login first to show your name as a sponsor.
Thank you for supporting the story! :)
Please Login first.
×
Write down what you like about the story
×
Reading Theme:
Font Size:
Line Spacing:
Paragraph Spacing:
Load the next issue automatically
Reset to default
×
People Who Like This
x
Before You Publish
Please ensure your story does not contain illegal, hateful, inciting, or violence-promoting content, or any infringing, plagiarized, or spam material, and that it complies with Penana’s Terms of Use.
Penana reserves the right to remove any content that violates these rules or causes legal or community risk, and to suspend or terminate related accounts.

