多謝巴絲們的指正,以下為此Post的更正:472Please respect copyright.PENANALw7toeAGit
472Please respect copyright.PENANACmxxppvZKT
三十秒科學–種樹是否一定能夠減低大氣二氧化碳含量?472Please respect copyright.PENANASuQWE1q42H
- 分享自 LIHKG 討論區472Please respect copyright.PENANAaeWBN5kRnC
https://lih.kg/2544217472Please respect copyright.PENANA3r3bNMJztU
472Please respect copyright.PENANAVCJqRkU0Fq
472Please respect copyright.PENANAw7Q46FX3Bg
圖片摘取自Ref1及2472Please respect copyright.PENANAhwu0uRK8Li472Please respect copyright.PENANA20kDGo4y7q
472Please respect copyright.PENANAFM3DbgpDVq
472Please respect copyright.PENANAXCljORY3qy
研究中指出草叢/部份樹木因配合泥土菌類獲取營養方式的不同,雖長得比較矮小,但能夠在泥土儲存較多的碳原子。472Please respect copyright.PENANAa890yeWBHN
472Please respect copyright.PENANAxspt8LiECS
而部分樹木因依靠泥土中的菌類幫忙,得以長得更高,而與此同時泥土相關的菌類則會釋放出更多的二氧化碳。472Please respect copyright.PENANAwcnCnkqbjB
472Please respect copyright.PENANAGiAHakVa5x
雖然長大較高的樹木比較低的草叢有更強的能力透過光合作用儲存碳原子,但相應地,助長樹木生長的菌類亦會從泥土中釋發出比助長草叢生長的菌類更多的二氧化碳。472Please respect copyright.PENANAZULWTn2Y3g
472Please respect copyright.PENANAetvq4aP9Nx
研究中並無證據直接顯示草叢吸取大氣二氧化碳的能力比樹木更高,上一篇我引述錯誤,若然引起任何誤會,希望可以見諒。472Please respect copyright.PENANAHEEvQO6rra
472Please respect copyright.PENANAxirYxGfiQz
Ref1:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01117-5472Please respect copyright.PENANAN8aTT6XIrr
Ref2:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00737-1
472Please respect copyright.PENANAeKHx4umqJc